sábado, agosto 16, 2003

Nova Iorque apagada

Os piratas da luz: testemunho de Greg Palast .


Roby Bailey © New York TimesO-A-M
blog #7
Sábado, Agosto 16, 2003
img: Roby Bailey © New York Times

O apagão ocorrido ontem nos Estados Unidos e no Canadá, para além de pôr a nu a extrema fragilidade dos sistemas complexos baseados em modelos de interdependência em cascata, e ainda a surpreendente precaridade de uma infra-estrutura tão basilar e ubíqua, como é a energia eléctrica, na grande super-potência, talvez venha a contribuir para um melhor conhecimento da pandilha de fanáticos que actualmente governa a problemática nação americana. Este apagão, como ficamos a saber depois de ler o excelente testemunho de Greg Palast, é uma consequência directa do assalto canino desencadeado pelos apóstolos mais obsessivos da "des-regulamentação" contra o sistema de bens e serviços que qualquer nação deve comandar em nome do interesse público e não do apetite insaciável dos piratas do ultra-liberalismo actualmente instalados com armas e bagagens na Casa Branca. -- ACP

PS - o texto de Greg Palast foi-me remetido por Michael Albert da ZNet.

POWER OUTAGE TRACED TO DIM BULB IN WHITE HOUSE
THE TALE OF THE BRITS WHO SWIPED 800 JOBS FROM NEW YORK, CARTED OFF $90 MILLION, THEN TONIGHT, TURNED OFF OUR LIGHTS

by Greg Palast

I can tell you all about the ne're-do-wells [azelhas] that put out our lights tonight. I came up against these characters -- the Niagara Mohawk Power Company -- some years back. You see, before I was a journalist, I worked for a living, as an investigator of corporate racketeers. In the 1980s, "NiMo" built a nuclear plant, Nine Mile Point, a brutally costly piece of hot junk for which NiMo and its partner companies charged billions to New York State's electricity ratepayers.

To pull off this grand theft by kilowatt, the NiMo-led consortium fabricated cost and schedule reports, then performed a Harry Potter job on the account books. In 1988, I showed a jury a memo from an executive from one partner, Long Island Lighting, giving a lesson to a NiMo honcho on how to lie to government regulators. The jury ordered LILCO to pay $4.3 billion and, ultimately, put them out of business.

And that's why, if you're in the Northeast, you're reading this by candlelight tonight. Here's what happened. After LILCO was hammered by the law, after government regulators slammed Niagara Mohawk and dozens of other book-cooking, document-doctoring utility companies all over America with fines and penalties totaling in the tens of billions of dollars, the industry leaders got together to swear never to break the regulations again. Their plan was not to follow the rules, but to ELIMINATE the rules. They called it "deregulation."
It was like a committee of bank robbers figuring out how to make safecracking legal. But they dare not launch the scheme in the USA. Rather, in 1990, one devious little bunch of operators out of Texas, Houston Natural Gas, operating under the alias "Enron," talked an over-the-edge free-market fanatic, Britain's Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, into licensing the first completely deregulated power plant in the hemisphere.

And so began an economic disease called "regulatory reform" that spread faster than SARS. Notably, Enron rewarded Thatcher's Energy Minister, one Lord Wakeham, with a bushel of dollar bills for 'consulting' services and a seat on Enron's board of directors. The English experiment proved the viability of Enron's new industrial formula: that the enthusiasm of politicians for deregulation was in direct proportion to the payola provided by power companies.
The power elite first moved on England because they knew Americans wouldn't swallow the deregulation snake oil easily. The USA had gotten used to cheap power available at the flick of switch. This was the legacy of Franklin Roosevelt who, in 1933, caged the man he thought to be the last of the power pirates, Samuel Insull. Wall Street wheeler-dealer Insull creator of the Power Trust, and six decades before Ken Lay, faked account books and ripped off consumers. To frustrate Insull and his ilk, FDR gave us the Federal Power Commission and the Public Utilities Holding Company Act which told electricity companies where to stand and salute. Detailed regulations limited charges to real expenditures plus a government-set profit. The laws banned "power markets" and required companies to keep the lights on under threat of arrest -- no blackout blackmail to hike rates.

Of particular significance as I write here in the dark, regulators told utilities exactly how much they had to spend to insure the system stayed in repair and the lights stayed on. Bureaucrats crawled along the wire and, like me, crawled through the account books, to make sure the power execs spent customers' money on parts and labor. If they didn't, we'd whack'm over the head with our thick rule books. Did we get in the way of these businessmen's entrepreneurial spirit? Damn right we did.

Most important, FDR banned political contributions from utility companies -- no 'soft' money, no 'hard' money, no money PERIOD.

But then came George the First. In 1992, just prior to his departure from the White House, President Bush Senior gave the power industry one long deep-through-the-teeth kiss good-bye: federal deregulation of electricity. It was a legacy he wanted to leave for his son, the gratitude of power companies which ponied up $16 million for the Republican campaign of 2000, seven times the sum they gave Democrats.

But Poppy Bush's gift of deregulating of wholesale prices set by the feds only got the power pirates halfway to the plunder of Joe Ratepayer. For the big payday they needed deregulation at the state level. There were only two states, California and Texas, big enough and Republican enough to put the electricity market con into operation.

California fell first. The power companies spent $39 million to defeat a 1998 referendum pushed by Ralph Nadar which would have blocked the de-reg scam. Another $37 million was spent on lobbying and lubricating the campaign coffers of legislators to write a lie into law: in the deregulation act's preamble, the Legislature promised that deregulation would reduce electricity bills by 20%. In fact, when San Diegans in the first California city to go "lawless" looked at their bills, the 20% savings became a 300% jump in surcharges.

Enron circled California and licked its lips. As the number one life-time contributor to the George W. Bush campaign, it was confident about the future. With just a half dozen other companies it controlled at times 100% of the available power capacity needed to keep the Golden State lit. Their motto, "your money or your lights." Enron and its comrades played the system like a broken ATM machine, yanking out the bills. For example, in the shamelessly fixed "auctions" for electricity held by the state, Enron bid, in one instance, to supply 500 megawatts of electricity over a 15 megawatt line. That's like pouring a gallon of gasoline into a thimble -- the lines would burn up if they attempted it. Faced with blackout because of Enron's destructive bid, the state was willing to pay anything to keep the lights on.

And the state did. According to Dr. Anjali Sheffrin, economist with the California state Independent System Operator which directed power movements, between May and November 2000, three power giants physically or "economically" withheld power from the state and concocted enough false bids to cost the California customers over $6.2 billion in excess charges.
It took until December 20, 2000, with the lights going out on the Golden Gate, for President Bill Clinton, once a deregulation booster, to find his lost Democratic soul and impose price caps in California and ban Enron from the market.

But the light-bulb buccaneers didn't have to wait long to put their hooks back into the treasure chest. Within seventy-two hours of moving into the White House, while he was still sweeping out the inaugural champagne bottles, George Bush the Second reversed Clinton's executive order and put the power pirates back in business in California. Enron, Reliant (aka Houston Industries), TXU (aka Texas Utilities) and the others who had economically snipped California's wires knew they could count on Dubya, who as governor of the Lone Star state cut them the richest deregulation deal in America.

Meanwhile, the deregulation bug made it to New York where Republican Governor George Pataki and his industry-picked utility commissioners ripped the lid off electric bills and relieved my old friends at Niagara Mohawk of the expensive obligation to properly fund the maintenance of the grid system.
And the Pataki-Bush Axis of Weasels permitted something that must have former New York governor Roosevelt spinning in his wheelchair in Heaven: They allowed a foreign company, the notoriously incompetent National Grid of England, to buy up NiMo, get rid of 800 workers and pocket most of their wages - producing a bonus for NiMo stockholders approaching $90 million.

Is tonight's black-out a surprise? Heck, no, not to us in the field who've watched Bush's buddies flick the switches across the globe. In Brazil, Houston Industries seized ownership of Rio de Janeiro's electric company. The Texans (aided by their French partners) fired workers, raised prices, cut maintenance expenditures and, CLICK! the juice went out so often the locals now call it, "Rio Dark."

So too the free-market cowboys of Niagara Mohawk raised prices, slashed staff, cut maintenance and CLICK! -- New York joins Brazil in the Dark Ages.
Californians have found the solution to the deregulation disaster: re-call the only governor in the nation with the cojones to stand up to the electricity price fixers. And unlike Arnold Schwarzenegger, Gov. Gray Davis stood alone against the bad guys without using a body double. Davis called Reliant Corp of Houston a pack of "pirates" --and now he'll walk the plank for daring to stand up to the Texas marauders.

So where's the President? Just before he landed on the deck of the Abe Lincoln, the White House was so concerned about our brave troops facing the foe that they used the cover of war for a new push in Congress for yet more electricity deregulation. This has a certain logic: there's no sense defeating Iraq if a hostile regime remains in California.

Sitting in the dark, as my laptop battery runs low, I don't know if the truth about deregulation will ever see the light --until we change the dim bulb in the White House.


Palast is the author of the New York Times bestseller, "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy" (Penguin USA 2003) and the worstseller, "Democracy and Regulation," a guide to electricity deregulation published by the United Nations (2003, written with T. MacGregor and J. Oppenheim). See Greg Palast's award-winning reports for BBC Television and the Guardian papers of Britain at www.GregPalast.com. Contact Palast at his New York office: media@gregpalast.com.


Another interesting view:
Village Voice
Pataki Policies Put Us at the Blackout Brink
August 20 - 26, 2003
New York's Prince of Darkness by Wayne Barrett

¶ 12:54 AM

sexta-feira, agosto 15, 2003

Cabrita Reis 1

From a dead artist to another (on cynicism issues.)


V.Carvalho por PCR?O-A-M
blog #6
Sexta-feira, Agosto 15, 2003

"Pedro Cabrita Reis is one of the most unique artists in the context of the renewal contemporary sculpture which dates from the middle of the eighties until today." - João Fernandes, Vicente Todoli (commissioner/ Portuguese pavilion), in Venice Biennial's site.

Is he?

Just imagine that Pistolleto presents a 'statue' honoring the Mayor of some little Italian town, say Tara for the purpose of this demonstration. Or that Susana Solano designs a 'monument' honoring the controversial Gil y Gil, ex-President of football team Atletico de Madrid and ex-Mayor of Marbella, the well-known Spanish tourist resort. In terms of pure esthetics, you should also imagine that we are talking about very conventional, "pompier" sculptures. It seems unimaginable doesn't it? Well, it isn't.

Pedro Cabrita Reis (PCR) did it. On June the first, eleven days before the 50th Venice Biennial opened it's many gates to the Press, an incredible monument to one of the most notorious Portuguese conservative Mayors was inaugurated in Maia by the local authorities (a notorious bishop included), some populace and Mr. Cabrita Reis.

José Vieira de Carvalho, died last year, was "elected" in 1973 a deputy member to the "Assembleia Nacional" (a puppet Parliament designed to legitimize the dictatorship). Three years before he was nominated Mayor of the suburban village of Maia by the Government. After the chute of Salazar-Caetano dictatorship, in April 74, Vieira de Carvalho entered the new right wing party CDS, and under that status was elected Maia's Mayor. He perpetuated himself in power 28 consecutive years (until his death), thanks to some oddities of the new Portuguese parliamentary democracy. Actually, some Portuguese local politicians manage to stay in power for decades.

The fact that there is now a noisy, though not very substantial discussion about removing this constitutional "bug", in order to induce more transparency in our democracy and prevent endemic corruption, turns even less tolerable the decision of the City Council to build a Monument to it's Mayor ("the founder of modern Maia" in the new Mayor's commemorative words), and the will of carrying on with it by PCR. The idea is in itself unacceptable (just imagine a statue for each politician in every European corner!). And the form, I mean the ridicule statue, in it's entire submission to the supposed ideological mandate of the client, is intellectually aberrant and artistically null. Modern Maia is the result of 28 years of democracy, and not the work of one dedicated bureaucrat, one resilient politician, one omniscient paterfamilias and one undisputable 'cacique'. It's a collective outcome and not a dubious heroic narrative (which by the way one cannot find no matter how hard one looks into Maia's municipal web site).
In a short note about he's commitment to the Mayor's homage, PCR wrote, "it was a profound challenge set to himself". He also wrote in the same note that "an artist is someone that carries inside him the will and power to brake with any tradition. But this very same vitality would also allow him to make a gesture so wide and deep as to interrogate even the utmost and thrilling novelty, undoing in this way any myth or interdiction." Worsening things up PCR closes he's "author's note" writing this amazing paragraph: "It is from this assumed individual creative liberty, and it's inherent refusal of any political, esthetical or cultural command, that the desire of accepting the invitation to sign this Homage was born." One may wonder if the City Hall was expecting anything less than a realistic and "academic" outcome of such a statement. Words, though, are not enough to disguise this obvious and opportunistic double standard.

How can a so-called contemporary artist show at the same time - in Maia and at Venice Biennial - such completely antagonistic art visions? Which are indeed two decadent versions of 19th century and 20th century art: a reactionary statue honoring a local conservative politician, as if we were living in pre-Rodin days, and some loose installations about nothing (though with a touch of refreshed "arte povera").

The curators Vicente Todolí and João Fernandes, that chose PCR to be the Portuguese representative in Venice Biennial, quoted him as having said or written the following: "I believe that in any art work what is to be perceived is that very particular, brief and silent moment when one experiences Intelligence, an absolute and total Intelligence through which everything comes together".

Is this the very example of the decadence and cynicism in the present art system? Is the fact that nobody saw such a flagrant ethical anomaly (namely the art critics, art journalists and apparatchiks of Portuguese art scene), or cares about such trivialities, already an evidence that the only thing that matters in the so-called art world today is nothing but media coverage and money at all costs?

An artist can prostitute his body, but not his art. -- ACP 

¶ 2:27 AM

segunda-feira, agosto 11, 2003

Soberania ilimitada

A obsessão panóptica do poder imperial.


web cam PhilipsO-A-M
blog #5
Segunda-feira, Agosto 11, 2003

O 11 de Setembro, cujas origens e ocorrência detalhadas estão longe de ser conhecidas, permitiu sobretudo à actual Administração Republicana dos EUA desencadear dois projectos aparentemente inimagináveis: o da soberania imperial ilimitada, que pretende fazer tábua rasa das leis internacionais e nacionais (de qualquer país!) sempre que tal lhe convier; e o do controlo orwelliano da humanidade, a pretexto da evolução das doutrinas estratégicas da defesa e da guerra, e ainda da luta contra o terrorismo. Esta realidade, que porventura não sofrerá recuos significativos depois do Sr. Bush desaparecer do mapa, coloca questões cruciais sobre o futuro imediato da humanidade. Pensemos apenas na associação deste processo de expansão em rede do poder militar e policial norte-americano à escala planetária à anunciada hegemonia química e bio-tecnológica do mesmo país sobre a produção alimentar mundial (através de gigantes tão bestiais quanto a Monsanto). Embora não possamos comparar esta espécie de fascismo panóptico com o Fascismo italiano e o Nazismo alemão, talvez estejamos de facto no início (doce) de um autêntico pesadelo. Numa economia hiper-tecnológica, o emprego será um bem cada vez mais especializado... e escasso. Não parece assim difícil imaginarmos que boa parte dos empregados venham a transformar-se em mero agentes humanos de um Estado Mundial.

A propósito deste tema recomendo duas leituras muito esclarecedoras:

1. Surveillance total, de Ignacio Ramonet

"En el pasado, ningún gobierno había tenido el poder de mantener a sus ciudadanos bajo una vigilancia constante. Ahora la Policía del Pensamiento vigilaba constantemente a todo el mundo". -- GEORGE ORWELL, 1984

Quienes este verano piensen pasar sus vacaciones en Estados Unidos han de saber que en virtud de un acuerdo entre la Comisión Europea y las autoridades federales, la compañía aérea con la que viajen entregará, sin su consentimiento, a las aduanas de Estados Unidos algunas informaciones personales. Incluso antes de que penetren en el avión, las autoridades de Estados Unidos conocerán su nombre, apellido, edad, dirección, números de pasaporte y tarjeta de crédito, estado de salud, preferencias alimentarias (que pueden indicar su religión), viajes anteriores, nombre y edad de quienes les acompañaron, organizaciones que financiaron sus desplazamientos, etc."

Surveillance totale
Vigilancia total
par/por Ignacio Ramonet

2. The Pentagon's Plan for Tracking Everything That Moves, Big Brother Gets a Brain, de Noah Shachtman

"Everything is set for a new Pentagon program to become perhaps the federal government's widest reaching, most invasive mechanism yet for keeping us all under watch. Not in the far-off, dystopian future. But here, and soon.
The military is scheduled to issue contracts for Combat Zones That See, or CTS, as early as September. The first demonstration should take place before next summer, according to a spokesperson. Approach a checkpoint at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, during the test and CTS will spot you. Turn the wheel on this sprawling, 8,656-acre army encampment, and CTS will record your action. Your face and license plate will likely be matched to those on terrorist watch lists. Make a move considered suspicious, and CTS will instantly report you to the authorities.

Fort Belvoir is only the beginning for CTS. Its architects at the Pentagon say it will help protect our troops in cities like Baghdad, where for the past few weeks fleeting attackers have been picking off American fighters in ones and twos. But defense experts believe the surveillance effort has a second, more sinister, purpose: to keep entire cities under an omnipresent, unblinking eye.
This isn't some science fiction nightmare. Far from it. CTS depends on parts you could get, in a pinch, at Kmart."

The Pentagon's Plan for Tracking Everything That Moves
Big Brother Gets a Brain
by Noah Shachtman

¶ 1:41 PM

Fogos 2003

A economia (e a política) do fogo

Para além dos pirómanos de serviço, que são uma excelente diversão para quem manobra a economia dos incêndios, a verdade que parece indelevelmente colada ao inferno de chamas que tem consumido milhares de hectares de floresta e mais de uma dezena de vidas humanas é, uma vez mais, a criminalidade organizada. Directa ou indirectamente, esta criminalidade serve a concentração do capital florestal nas multinacionais da celulose e da pasta de papel, serve os especuladores imobiliários, e até parece servir as debilitadas finanças públicas do País (pois, como referiu uma ilustre comissária europeia, se os prejuízos atingirem 0,6% do PIB, dispara automaticamente um mecanismo de ajuda europeia no valor de muitos milhões de Euros, disponíveis já em Outubro...). Não sei se a avaliação dos estragos já estava feita quando a Senhora burocrata grega disse levianamente o que disse, mas presumo que alguém se encarregará desta aritmética maquiavélica!

Tal como noutros domínios, onde reina a lei da maquinação e o crime, este é um caso que merece uma investigação pública sem precedentes. A cidadania pode e deve criar um Observatório do Fogo, capaz de mapear a complexidade do fenómeno e de detectar as possíveis redes criminosas a ele associadas.

PS - Esta teoria, algo conspirativa, sobre a catástrofe deste Verão, não pretende ocultar duas outras realidades igualmente causadoras dos milhares de incêndios que anualmente afligem as povoações atingidas: a falta de ordenamento do território florestal (onde deve caber a legislação, a dotação de meios técnicos e humanos, a vigilância e a informação pública) e o aquecimento global, responsável por um número crescente de grandes incêndios, dificilmente controláveis, em todo o mundo. Num País densamente florestado como Portugal, mas que por outro lado se encontra pressionado pela desertificação que avança do Norte de África sobre a Península Ibérica e o Sul da Europa em geral, teremos que perspectivar urgentemente todo este problema de uma forma estratégica: com relatórios científicos apropriados, e com um Programa Estratégico Contra a Desertificação, politicamente assumido, não apenas pelos partidos políticos, mas por toda a sociedade civil. -- ACP [actualizado em 17.08.2003]

O-A-M
blog #4
Segunda-feira, Agosto 11, 2003

¶ 1:44 AM

domingo, agosto 10, 2003

Pedofilia

Estratégias perigosas

Até agora a principal defesa de Carlos Cruz, Jorge Ritto e Paulo Pedroso resume-se a um único argumento: não podemos defender os nossos clientes se não soubermos de que são efectivamente acusados! Em volta deste argumento absurdo - pois todo o País sabe quais as suspeitas que recaem sobre os ditos arguidos - levantou-se uma impenetrável cortina de fumo em volta das limitações do nosso sistema judicial (com particular ênfase no famigerado Código do Processo Penal), cujo principal objectivo parece ser a descredibilização simultânea da investigação policial e da instrução do processo acusatório. Entretanto, o episódio das escutas telefónicas acabou por envolver um conjunto inesperado de novos actores nesta perigosa táctica: o actual Secretário-Geral do Partido Socialista, o deputado e ex-Ministro da Justiça António Costa e o próprio Presidente da República! Depois de dar a conhecer a transcrição das escutas que estariam na base da manutenção da medida de prisão preventiva imposta ao seu irmão, João Pedroso, membro suspenso do Conselho Superior da Magistratura, quebrou o seu apreciado silêncio para desferir um ataque fortíssimo contra o Juiz de Instrução responsável pelo Processo da Casa Pia, acusando-o de actos "ilegítimos e ilegais". A situação é grave. E é grave sobretudo por causa da assustadora sensação de existirem forças poderosas e conjugadas apostadas em descredibilizar de qualquer maneira o trabalho da Justiça neste caso. Nem o Juiz Rui Teixeira, nem o Procurador-Geral da República, nem a respectiva Corporação se mostraram, todavia, dispostos a ceder às pressões intoleráveis que sobre eles têm sido feitas. O roubo de documentos da Casa Pia, ocorrido recentemente, pode vir a ser o primeiro episódio da segunda fase da defesa: descredibilizar as principais testemunhas deste Processo. Num caso como este, porém, todas estas tácticas acabarão por se voltar contra os seus promotores (directos e indirectos, a curto e a longo prazo).

Leitura recomendável a propósito das diferenças entre sexo intergeracional, pedofilia e abuso sexual de menores: Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children From Sex, by Judith Levine (e a recensão de Paul Demko no City Pages, Burn this Book. - - ACP

OAM n. 3
Domingo, Agosto 10, 2003

¶ 1:40 AM

quinta-feira, julho 24, 2003

Jorge Batista

Endurance
escultura ameaçada pela sua própria definição


Uruborus, a serpente que come a sua própria cauda é uma metáfora dos ciclos vitais da Natureza. Uma espécie de objectividade inelutável perante a qual a Cultura humana acaba por parecer uma ilusão risível, ou a tragédia caricata de Sísifo subindo a montanha com uma pedra às costas, que invariavelmente deixa cair e rolar até ao fundo da montanha, para logo voltar a recomeçar. Assim também Endurance parece desafiar este tipo de impossibilidade obrigatória: a escultura e a sua peanha/montanha tombam sob o peso da própria gravidade (gravidade cultural do momento implosivo que atravessa a chamada Arte Contemporânea?), no que não deixa de ser uma inteligente e belíssima citação dos mundos telúricos de Eisenstein e Tatlin. O Propano que alimenta o bico de gás vem do depósito sobre o qual incide a chama incandescente, ameaçando curto-circuitar o futuro imediato (e "histórico") da própria escultura. Não é tanto da impossibilidade representar, mas mais da impossibilidade de crer, que esta escultura nos fala (e fala bem).

Noutra obra, apresentada nesta exposição - Passo -, deparamo-nos com um vídeo em movimento perpétuo (loop), retomando noutro suporte a mesma ideia de retroacção (feed-back), de demonstração da ilusória epistemologia da realidade em movimento e de transformação de uma narrativa vital na fatalidade de Sísifo. Os desenhos e os re-desenhos transformam-se digitalmente em animação. Mas a animação perpétua das imagens, suprindo a falta da terceira dimensão, ou melhor, transformando o movimento numa fase nova e inesperada da terceira dimensão, acaba por fazer daquele vídeo uma escultura. Uma escultura igualmente instável, porque sobra por todo o lado uma verdadeira crise de fé.

Quinta, 24 de Julho, 22h: "Endurance" (escultura) + "Passo" (animação).
A escultura "Endurance" continuará exposta em Setembro.
Galeria Quadrum

OAM n.2
Quinta-feira, Julho 24, 2003

¶ 7:41 PM

Cova da Moura

Cova da Moura
Foto © autor desconhecido

Passeio filosófico

Em Dezembro de 2001, na Cova da Moura, Angelo, um jovem de 17 anos, foi baleado mortalmente nas costas pela PSP. A actuação de 90 polícias para acalmar os ânimos dum grupo de pessoas indignadas com o sucedido foi acompanhada por todas as estações de TV, projectando a imagem do bairro duma forma duvidosa junto da opinião pública portuguesa.

Em Fevereiro de 2002, na Damaia, um traficante de droga baleou e matou Felisberto, polícia caboverdiano nascido e criado na Cova da Moura. Estes incidentes, associados ao crescente tráfico de droga na zona (especialmente depois da destruição das barracas do Casal Ventoso) e à animosidade latente nalguns grupos organizados de jovens, faz deste aglomerado sub-urbano uma zona a evitar.

E no entanto, a Cova da Moura é um extraordinário exemplo daquilo a que poderíamos chamar "cidadania lateral". Em menos de 30 anos, cerca de 7000 pessoas construiram uma cidade ilegal (clandestina seria se as autoridades oficiais desconhecessem a sua existência, o que nunca foi o caso!), pobre, desprezada pela Autarquia (que agora é Socialista...), mas onde podemos ver a matriz orgânica de uma cidade, fruto da cooperação e não, como também podemos reparar em toda a sua vizinhança, da mais corrupta e abjecta especulação imobiliária. É precisamente esta realidade que pretendemos agora cartografar, desenhando um outro mapa mental daquela zona da Grande Lisboa.

Seguindo de perto as estratégias Psicogeográficas (oriundas das acções Situacionistas de meados do século passado), resolvemos redesenhar a imagem do Bairro do Alto da Cova da Moura a partir da linha irregular pontuada pelos 35 cabeleireiros nele existentes. Cremos que para os arquitectos, artistas, antropólogos, sociólogos, psicólogos e, em geral, gente de bem, esta é uma proposta irresistível!

Cova da Moura, Passeio Filosófico - 2003, 30 de Julho
Ponto de Partida: Galeria Quadrum - 18h
Promotor: Sociedade Portuguesa de Psicogeografia
Apoio: Associação Cultural Moinho da Juventude
Guia: Joaozinho
Quadrum Galeria de Arte



Philosophical Walk  

Cova da Moura is an incredible example of what we might call lateral citizenship. In less than 30 years, 7000 men and women, mostly from the african islands of Cabo-Verde (but also from the North of Portugal, Angola, Mozambique and Eastern Europe), built an illegal town in one of the suburban areas around Lisbon.

A large part of the property is private, and a small part is either common ground or it belongs to a solidarity institution. Speculators and the municipality of Amadora city (actually a 'Socialist' one!) want to destroy this marvellous "urban tapestry".

Some violent events took place in 2001 and 2002: by December 2001, a 17 years old boy was shot dead in his back by the Police; in February 2002 Felisberto, a young black policeman born and grown up in Cova da Moura was shot and killed by some drug diller. These tragic incidents put Cova da Moura on the media map. Drug dealing, gangs and gang wars, as well as poverty are responsible for most of the fear that Cova da Moura inspires to an average Lisbon fellow.

Our walk will trace another map of this site! We will follow the trace that link the 35 hairdressers that operate in Cova da Moura and are responsable for some of the most creative hair sculptures we can see everywhere in the metropolitan area of Lisbon.


Cova da Moura, Philosophical Walk - 2003, July 30
Check Point: Quadrum Galeria de Arte - 18h
Idea: Sociedade Portuguesa de Psicogeografia
Support: Associação Cultural Moinho da Juventude
Guide: Joaozinho
Quadrum Galeria de Arte

OAM n.1
Quinta-feira, Julho 24, 2003
¶ 7:43 PM

ÚLTIMA ATUALIZAÇÃO: 2 nov 2013, 00:10