A heroína financeira

Christine Lagarde: heroína ou metadorna?

Não há meio de entenderem...

Os juros das obrigações europeias estão em queda acentuada, com os investidores a apostarem que Christine Lagarde vai manter a política de estímulos do Banco Central Europeu. A escolha da diretora-geral do FMI para suceder a Draghi está também a impulsionar as bolsas.  

—in Jornal de Negócios, 3/7/209

A malta ainda não percebeu que a destruição das taxas de juro, sendo um recurso para evitar o colapso dos bancos e dos governos, ao prolongar-se no tempo, acaba por funcionar como uma verdadeira heroína financeira, que hipertrofia os Estados, impulsiona a especulação e a corrupção, e arruina os povos—começando, desde logo, por destruir as classes médias. O Prédio Coutinho seria inimaginável em democracias saudáveis. A sua ocorrência revela-nos até que ponto estas já estão ameaçadas pelos novos salteadores e assassinos.

O declínio da prosperidade começou no final da década de 1960, há 50 anos. Uma consequência do fim da fase da aceleração demográfica mundial (por volta de 1964), e do encarecimento real da energia e dos recursos naturais.

Ou seja, é fundamental abandonarmos o maniqueísmo e olhar para a realidade, discernindo a causa das coisas.

Duas leituras recomendáveis:

Clique para ampliar

It's Official: This Is The Longest Economic Expansion On Record

It’s official: as of this moment, the US economic expansion is now the longest on record, entering its 121st month since the end of the 2009 recession (which according to the NBER ended in June of that year), and surpassing the previous 120 month record - the March 1991 - March 2001 expansion - which ended with the bursting of the dot com bubble.

How long will US business cycles be in the future?

With the last four super-long US cycles attributed to globalization, demographics, downward wage pressures, positive global disinflation, fiat money, increased debt/deficits, and QE, then the answer will come from answers as to how sustainable these trends are.

We'll skip demographics and globalization as these are slower-acting, tectonic shifts, and focus on topics that are as salient today as ever - especially with another debt ceiling fight looming in D.C. With regards to debt and deficits, if anything the US has moved into an era of higher structural deficits and higher government debt, according to DB.

[...]

It's worth noting that as the ties to gold were loosened, the economic policy could become more flexible - think more and more debt - allowing the "opportunity" for more stimulus. Deutsche Bank shows this by highlighting the length of each US business cycle but this time with the annual US budget deficit (left) and total Government Debt to GDP (right) overlaid on top. Bottom line: with the US dollar becoming unanchored from gold in the 1970s, it allowed every successive administration to avoid recessions by piling up more debt and spending at an ever faster rate.

[...]

So to conclude, retreating globalization and weakening demographics are more negative for business cycle length going forward. However, while we are still able to run large deficits, accumulate more debt, and conduct more money printing we can still manipulate the length of cycles relative to the past. Maybe inflation is the glue here. Once that starts to structurally increase, business cycle management becomes more challenging.

[...]

As Deutsche Bank concludes, it's an interesting paradox that this cycle has consistently been one of the weakest in terms of economic growth but one of the strongest in terms of asset price growth. It also hints at the extraordinary lengths global authorities have gone to ensure this recovery continued. Liquidity and intervention have been enormous and this has flowed into assets, not the economy.

So as we celebrate the longest US expansion in history and the fourth ultra long cycle in a row, the only question worth pondering is what the costs of what as of July 1 will be the longest cycle in history, will end up being?

—in Zero Hedge, by Tyler Durden, Mon, 07/01/2019 - 06:33
“It’s Official: This Is The Longest Economic Expansion On Record”

Clique para aumentar

O fim da prosperidade petrolífera

What if the “prosperity” of the past 50 years is mostly a statistical mirage for the bottom 80% of households? What if whatever real gains (adjusted for real-world loss of purchasing power) accrued only to the top of the wealth-power pyramid, those closest to financial and political power? What if the U.S. economy and society shifted from “everybody wins” to “winner takes all” or at best: the winner takes most”?

“...how much housing, higher education, and well-being does the average wage buy now compared to decades past? Not much. The statistics are bleak: wages are basically unchanged from the high water mark 50 years ago, which coincidentally was also the high water mark of U.S. energy production until very recently. Adjusted for purchasing power and quality, the average paycheck buys far less than it did 50 years ago.”

—in Charles Hugh Smith, “America’s Concealed Crisis: Fifty Years of Economic Decline, 1969 to 2019”.