Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta III Guerra Mundial. Mostrar todas as mensagens
Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta III Guerra Mundial. Mostrar todas as mensagens

quarta-feira, janeiro 28, 2009

Crise Global 58

Israel: podemos destruir todas as capitais europeias

We have the capability to take the world down with us

Iran can never be threatened in its very existence. Israel can. Indeed, such a threat could even grow out of the current intifada. That, at least, is the pessimistic opinion of Martin Van Crevel, professor of military history at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. 'If it went on much longer,' he said, 'the Israeli government [would] lose control of the people. In campaigns like this, the anti-terror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing. I regard a total Israeli defeat as unavoidable. That will mean the collapse of the Israeli state and society. We'll destroy ourselves.'

In this situation, he went on, more and more Israelis were coming to regard the 'transfer' of the Palestinians as the only salvation; resort to it was growing 'more probable' with each passing day. Sharon 'wants to escalate the conflict and knows that nothing else will succeed'.

But would the world permit such ethnic cleansing? 'That depends on who does it and how quickly it happens. We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force. Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother." I consider it all hopeless at this point. We shall have to try to prevent things from coming to that, if at all possible. Our armed forces, however, are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.' — in The war game-The Gun and the Oliver Branch by David Hirst, guardian.co.uk, Sunday 21 September 2003 00.51 BST.

COMENTÁRIO: ora aqui está um recado que a pró-Sionista imprensa portuguesa, e boa parte dos nossos invertebrados comentadores de política internacional, vão gostar de saborear. O incidente entre Erdogan (Turquia) e Shimon Perez (Israel), que marcou a conferência de Davos deste Inverno, testemunha bem a gravidade das feridas deixadas pela recente invasão criminosa da faixa da Gaza pelas forças armadas israelitas.


OAM 526 28-01-2009 02:17 (última actualização: 01-02-2009 18:39)

segunda-feira, setembro 22, 2008

Crise Global 23

O colapso da América IV

Morgan Stanley e Goldman Sachs deixam de ser bancos de investimento e acolhem-se à protecção do regime mais favorável da banca comercial e sobretudo dos planos sinistros de Henry Paulson e Ben Bernanke.


"Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency." -- in proposta do Secretário do Tesouro, Henry Paulson, ao Congresso norte-americano.

Depois da decisão do Supremo Tribunal dos Estados Unidos, do ano 2000, que suspendeu a contagem de votos que daria a vitória a Al Gore, entregando-a sem mais a George W. Bush; depois da instauração do Patriotic Act, que pela primeira vez na história dos Estados Unidos suspende o habeas corpus por tempo indeterminado e cria efectivamente o enquadramento jurídico necessário à aplicação de todo o tipo de medidas de excepção por parte do governo americano, contra pessoas, empresas e bens estrangeiros e nacionais; depois de o governo dos Estados Unidos se auto-declarar acima da lei internacional, sob o pretexto de uma guerra longa contra o terrorismo que ele próprio, em muitos casos, engendrou e engendra, atacando e ocupando ilegalmente países estrangeiros, surge agora a tentativa de fechar o quadrado mágico de um golpe de Estado que, a ter sucesso (26 de Setembro é o prazo limite), porá provavelmente fim à democracia americana, instaurando em seu lugar, ainda que disfarçado por doses descomunais de sofisticada propaganda, um regime de excepção só na aparência distinto das ditaduras europeias que antecederam a II Guerra Mundial.

Basicamente, o que Henry Paulson (antigo dirigente da Goldman Sachs e actual secretário de estado do tesouro) e Ben Bernanke (presidente máximo da Reserva Federal) querem, e para tal têm vindo a chantagear os órgãos eleitos da democracia americana, é o seguinte:
  1. levar o contribuinte americano a comprar por mais de 700 000 000 000 de dólares (aliás, muito mais!) todas as hipotecas e empréstimos em mau estado, que Paulson e Bernanke decidam resgatar, sem supervisão nem possibilidade de recurso por parte das instâncias legislativa, nem dos tribunais, o que implicará aumentar a dívida pública, grosso modo, em mais 1 bilião de dólares -- 10E12 --, sobrecarregando cada homem, mulher e criança dos Estados Unidos com uma dívida suplementar de 2000 dólares);
  2. renegociar posteriormente estes créditos mal-parados com os devedores, depois de previamente reavaliados os activos a que correspondem, recorrendo para tal às mesmas instituições financeiras que haviam despachado os créditos incobráveis para o bolso sem fundo (mas falido) do Estado americano, e a quem os clientes pedirão de novo dinheiro emprestado (entretanto recebido do saco sem fundo do Tesouro americano, i.e. dos bolsos dos contribuintes!) para conseguirem salvar os bens adquiridos, as empresas e os negócios ameaçados pela execução das hipotecas;
  3. como parte substancial dos investidores e especuladores com activos financeiros ameaçados (que não tiveram tempo para desviar a massa, nos últimos meses, para os paraísos fiscais, sediados nomeadamente nas ilhas soberanas da Rainha de Inglaterra) são literalmente estados estrangeiros como a China, o Japão, a Rússia, a Arábia Saudita e outros países da OPEP, o resgate das suas contas vai depender em muito dos poderes discricionários que Barak Obama e John McCain anunciaram estar dispostos a conferir, via Congresso, a duas criaturas sem vergonha (Paulosn e Bernanke), na realidade comandadas por velhos conhecidos da verdadeira mão invisível do Capitalismo: JP Morgan, Rockfeller e mais alguns comandos secretos do FED.
A situação é, no mínimo explosiva! Os chineses, que recusaram perder mais dinheiro a favor dos piratas americanos que a eles têm vindo a recorrer desesperadamente nos últimos meses e semanas, desencadearam um raid mundial de compras, sobretudo dirigido ao sistema financeiro americano, em manifesto colapso. Pode estar em curso uma verdadeira e antecipada deslocação do centro de gravidade da finança e da economia mundiais, de Nova Iorque e Londres, para Beijing e Xangai. Haverá, por causa deste descalabro, uma revolução nos Estados Unidos? Ou será que os reencarnados e rebaptizados Endtimers americanos, apoiados pelo Sionismo mundial, conseguirão mesmo desencadear uma grande guerra quente, termo-nuclear, isto é o Apocalipse, repetidamente visto nos seus alucinados transes religiosos e orgias sexuais?


REFERÊNCIAS

Run on the $10 Trillion 'Shadow Banking System': Regulators Allow Goldman, Morgan To Become Banks

* Sep 21: Fed approved applications by Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley to become Federal Reserve-regulated bank holding companies (BHCs).

* The move effectively spells the end of the investment banking industry as a separate sector, leaving behind only small boutique securities firms. In doing so it ends the decades old division of the US financial industry into two halves, which dates back to legislation passed after the Great Depression.

* It means that both Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley will be subject to bank capital requirements which will be phased in over a transition period. -- RGE Monitor.


Details Of Treasury's $700bn 'Bad Bank': Unchecked Authority to Buy a Wide Range of 'Toxic Waste'?

* U.S. Treasury Fact Sheet: "Treasury will have authority to issue up to $700 billion of Treasury securities to finance the purchase of troubled assets. The purchases are intended to be residential and commercial mortgage-related assets, which may include mortgage-backed securities and whole loans. The Secretary will have the discretion, in consultation with the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, to purchase other assets, as deemed necessary to effectively stabilize financial markets." Treasury's actions may also not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency. -- RGE Monitor.


Bailout of the U.S. Housing and Financial Sector: Are Fiscal Costs and Risk for Taxpayers Getting Bigger?

* Treasury plans to use $700 bn to buy bad mortgages of financial institutions; also proposes to raise the ceiling on national debt from $10.6 trillion to $11.3 trillion (the limit was raised to $10.6tr earlier this year under the housing bill)

* Advocates of bailout: Cost of the bailout much less than the risk to financial sector, Main Street and U.S. workers from the credit crisis and govt inaction; Opponents: Risk to taxpayers exceeds any potential upside gain apart from leading to higher debt and credit costs in the future and posing risk to U.S. sovereign debt rating. -- RGE Monitor.


Chinese Banks Go Global: How Will Foreign Regulators Respond?

* Chinese financial institutions like CDB, ICBC, Mingsheng Bank and insurance companies like Ping An are increasing overseas acquisitions taking stakes in Barclays, Standard Bank, Fortis and others. Chinese banks remain flush with cash following IPOs, bond issues, are eyeing foreign purchases to increase their expertise of investment banking, market share but may be wary of investing in global banks given losses from previous investments. They may now be seeking out M&A opportunities that are joint ventures.

* First round of Chinese bank M&A took place in mid-90s to 2005, and was focused on greater China. Since 2006, outward M&A has involved bigger deals and a broader range of target countries (Boston Consulting Group) -- RGE Monitor.


Radical Shift for Goldman and Morgan

Article Tools Sponsored By
By ANDREW ROSS SORKIN and VIKAS BAJAJ
Published: September 21, 2008

Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, the last big independent investment banks on Wall Street, will transform themselves into bank holding companies subject to far greater regulation, the Federal Reserve said Sunday night, a move that fundamentally reshapes an era of high finance that defined the modern Gilded Age.

... By becoming bank holding companies, the firms are agreeing to significantly tighter regulations and much closer supervision by bank examiners from several government agencies rather than only the Securities and Exchange Commission. Now, the firms will look more like commercial banks, with more disclosure, higher capital reserves and less risk-taking.

... For decades, firms like Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs thrived by taking bold bets with their own money, often using enormous amounts of debt to increase their profits, with little outside oversight.

They were the envy of Wall Street, dominating the industry’s most lucrative businesses, landing headline-grabbing deals and advising companies and governments around the world on mergers, stock offerings and restructurings.

... In exchange for subjecting themselves to more regulation, the companies will have access to the full array of the Federal Reserve’s lending facilities. It should help them avoid the fate of Lehman Brothers, which filed for bankruptcy last week, and Bear Stearns and Merrill Lynch — both of which agreed to be acquired by big bank holding companies. -- New York Times.


Double Double Toil And Trouble
September 20, 2008
Elaine Meinel Supkis

The desires of the US/EU/UK empire to have eternal riches via NATO menacing, controlling and killing Muslims who have oil, has failed miserably. Now, we are going rapidly bankrupt. I remember very clearly the mood in America before the despicable invasion of Iraq: 'We are going to have cheaper oil!' Bush fired anyone who told him, this war would be very expensive. The belief was, we would rush into Bagdad, settle down and pump the oil for our own benefit. Instead, the Iraqis succeeded in costing us an extra trillion dollars. We lost money in this casino. The three witches are laughing in their Cave of Wealth and Death. Witch #2, Inflation, has toured the planet and destroyed great wealth. Witch #3, Depression, is ironing her dress in preparation of taking over the surviving wealth. And Witch #1, the top witch, is Libra. She is going to finally balance her scales and will be happy when this process is done. -- Culture of Life News.


The $1 trillion question: Will this gigantic bailout work?
Sean O’Grady, Economics Editor
Saturday, 20 September 2008

This is what we might call the $1trillion question. That's $1,000,000,000,000, by the way. It is a little like surgery. The US government has amputated the gangrenous leg of the banking system to save the patient. But it is now preparing to graft the infected limb on to the body politic of America. The US taxpayers will be lucky if they do not feel distinctly unwell as a result of this little experiment.

The truth is that simply buying the banks' worthless securities has been an option, if an unpalatable one, for the authorities since the credit crunch began a year ago. All the plans to lend against these assets, such as the Bank of England's Special Liquidity Scheme, and other "injections of liquidity", were temporary solutions, born out of a hope, if not an expectation, that the crisis would not be prolonged.

We know better now. What the American authorities have done is the only sure way to protect the banking system against further destabilisation. Short-selling or not, left to their own devices, the markets would sooner or later force more banks into the arms of the taxpayer anyhow. It is a sad day when hard-pressed citizens find themselves subsidising private banks for their stupid mistakes. But that is what's happening in the US, and it will surely be done here. The Bank of England hates the notion; but Gordon Brown may well feel that he has no choice.

So for the banks and their shareholders and staff, the US rescue plan is already working, and it will save the wider economy from yet more damage. It is less clear whether it will end the credit crisis or preserve America's fast disappearing economic hegemony.

Even taking a trillion dollars of crud out of the equation can't save the financial system from damage already done. Despite the Fed's efforts, many banks in America and around the world have severely enfeebled balance sheets. They cannot lend, even if they wanted to. With the developed world in recession – Japan, Britain, Germany and Spain are leading the way – the banks will soon be losing money on their conventional lines of business, as mortgages suffer defaults and companies go out of business. We will then see a vicious cycle of bad debts leading to less lending, more job losses, more defaults and so on. -- Independent.


Where, oh where, are the orthodox economists now?
Ann Pettifor
20th September, 2008.

What has happened under the dominance of orthodox economics and the de-regulation of finance, is that the finance sector now controls the movement of capital, the setting of interest rates and the creation of credit. And they do so in the interests of – you guessed it – Finance.

In the midst of all this tragedy and chaos, one has to savour the moment. The sight of all those free-market capitalists, trained by economists at the Chicago School of neo-liberalism, handing over to ‘big government’ the financial system of the biggest free market economy in the world.

And in the midst of what will prove to be a prolonged period of economic failure, one must be allowed to indulge just one feint sense of satisfaction. For only a couple of weeks ago (see below) Jim O’Neill chief economist at Goldman Sachs, advised me, and a BBC World Service audience that this financial catastrophe was no big deal, ‘just another periodic crisis’….. like five that he had already lived through. (He was referring, I believe, to crises such as that of the US stock market of 1987, the South East Asian crisis of 1998 and the Dot.com crash of 2001.)

It is now pretty clear that I, without the data, research back-up and infrastructure that supports Jim O’Neill’s analyses – already knew that this was not at all like the previous ‘periodic crises’. With my background in Keynesian monetary theory, I had a more sophisticated and accurate view of the gravity of this crisis than Goldman Sachs’s neo-liberal economists. Regrettably my foresight and wisdom did not extend to earning Goldman Sachs-like fees. More fool me. -- Debtonation.


OAM 439 22-09-2008 13:32

quarta-feira, setembro 03, 2008

Eurasia adiada - 6

Guerra fria, não, mas uma guerra a sério, talvez!

Se a União Europeia implodir -- e poderá implodir em menos de um ápice --, as suas várias nações terão que rever sem demora nem hesitação uma série de ideias novas a que se foram habituando docemente sob um regadio de "fundos de coesão comunitária". Estes, aliás, poderão deixar de fluir muito antes de 2013, até já no próximo inverno, se entretanto os vassalos europeus da América insistirem em arrancar um braço à Rússia, encurralar uma vez mais a Alemanha, e transformar a Europa num vinhedo americano (1). A dupla de ladrões e criminosos de guerra (2) que manda nos EUA -- George W. Bush e Dick Cheney -- prepara-se para colocar forças da NATO em território georgiano, radares e mísseis na República Checa e na Polónia (3). Se isso acontecer, não vejo como evitaremos uma guerra imediata no Cáucaso, que logo poderá alastrar à Polónia, República Checa, Ucrânia, ex-Jugoslávia, etc.

Os países falidos do "Ocidente" -- sobretudo os Estados Unidos da América (4) e o Reino Unido -- querem a guerra, como aliás quiseram em 1939 e em 1914. Não têm, julgam eles, nada a perder. E se ganharem, deixarão de pagar o que devem, imaginam. Sucede, porém, neste caso, que os seus maiores credores são... o Japão e a China! Ou seja, não bastará infernizar a Europa e a Rússia. Teriam que ir mais longe. É por isso que nunca terão sucesso na sinistra matança imperial que, uma vez mais, querem impor a milhões de pessoas de todo o planeta.

O ponto da nova guerra é o mesmo das duas grandes guerras que dizimaram dezenas de milhões de pessoas no século 20: controlar e explorar despudoradamente o recurso primário da modernidade: o petróleo (5). Só que desta vez a coisa é bem pior, pois trata-se de uma guerra por um recurso em vias de extinção económica. Por mais voltas que dê, não vejo como vamos sair inteiros deste covil de cascáveis.

Na eventualidade do desastre iminente conduzir a uma guerra na Europa, e portanto ao colapso imediato da União Europeia, haverá que reforçar de imediato algumas definições políticas essenciais à independência e sobrevivência do nosso país:
  1. A definição de soberania nacional (incluindo a reversão de alguns instrumentos perdidos);
  2. A definição de autoridade do Estado (incluindo uma revisão constitucional que reforce drasticamente os poderes do Presidente da República);
  3. A definição de sectores estratégicos da economia (com reversão da posse dos mesmos a favor do interesse comum);
  4. A definição do poder local (com reforço extraordinário das respectivas competências)
  5. A definição de serviço público imperativo e prioritário (com a delimitação clara daquilo que só à governação pública democrática compete realizar, libertando para a sociedade civil tudo o que não seja essencial.)
O objectivo imediato dos Estados Unidos, de Israel e do Reino Unido, é anestesiar militarmente a Rússia, actual braço armado da China (6). Mas a China é, em última instância, o alvo estratégico dos actuais senhores do mundo. O cenário é demencial e apocalíptico. Mas não irreversível. Temo, porém, que a Europa possa vir a ser uma vez mais sacrificada neste ritual macabro da avareza, ira e luxúria assassinas.


NOTAS
  1. A Ucrânia, a Polónia, a República Checa, a Geórgia, a Moldávia e o Azerbeijão não passam actualmente de estados fantoche ao serviço da estratégia imperial dos EUA, que tem no Reino Unido e em Israel os seus maiores aliados. As viagens desta semana, de Cheney à Geórgia, e de Condoleezza Rice a Lisboa, inspiram as maiores preocupações aos defensores da paz europeia e mundial. Os Açores não se devem prestar, de novo, para o desencadear de uma guerra, que será criminosa e cujo único fito é permitir a estratégia de domínio mundial, a partir dum controlo sanguinário da Eurásia, por parte do complexo industrial-militar americano e das famílias do petróleo que nele mandam. Leia-se, a propósito dos meandros desta crise, este artigo de Michel Chossudovsky:
    The Eurasian Corridor: Pipeline Geopolitics and the New Cold War, by Michel Chossudovsky

    Washington's objective is ultimately to weaken and destabilize Russia's pipeline network --including the Friendship Pipeline and the Baltic Pipeline System (BPS)-- and its various corridor links into the Western Europe energy market. -- in Global Research.

  2. Leia-se este depoimento do antigo embaixador britânico no Uzbequistão (extracto):
    Hypocrite Miliband And The Myth Of Western Moral Superiority

    David Miliband was making great show today of fulminating in Kiev against Russian disregard of international law. Yet simultaneously he is continuing the sorry British record of participation in war crimes and contravention of the UN Convention Against Torture, Article IV of which covers "complicity" in torture. Both of these are serious breaches of international law.

    Binyam Mohamed is a British resident who was the victim of illegal rendition and hideous torture in several countries.

    Miliband has declined to release further evidence about the case on grounds of national security, arguing that disclosure would harm Britain's intelligence relationship with the US (Guardian).

    Mohamed faces a "Trial" by military tribunal in Guantanamo Bay. Judges, defence and prosecution lawyers are all members of the US military. Neither Mohamed not his defence lawyers will be allowed to see much of the evidence against him. This includes evidence of participation in his torture by British security services, and details of where he was being held and interrogated over two years (Uzbekistan? Afghanistan? Poland? Diego Garcia? - Miliband is keeping it secret). By the symmetry of evil, UK evidence is being witheld on grounds it could damage security cooperation with the US, while US evidence is being witheld on the grounds it could damage security cooperation with the UK. This farce is sickening.

    It was, of course, the excuse that security cooperation with Saudi Arabia would be damaged that led to the dropping of the prosecution of the vile corrupt executives at BAE. The operations of the security services are, beyond any shade of argument, above the law both sides of the Atlantic.

    When I threw over my diplomatic career to expose the hideous UK/CIA complicity with torture in Uzbekistan, I genuinely believed that my personal sacrifice would form part of a movement which would end this abomination being carried out in our names. In fact, the Bush/Blair acolytes have pushed further to the point that poor Binyan Mohamed faces a fate that would have been beyond the pen of Kafka.

    Never mind, let's divert the public by pointing at those evil Russians! -- in Craig Murray website.
  3. Missile Defense: Washington and Poland just moved the World closer to War, by F. William Engdahl

    The signing on August 14 of an agreement between the governments of the United States and Poland to deploy on Polish soil US ‘interceptor missiles’ is the most dangerous move towards nuclear war the world has seen since the 1962 Cuba Missile crisis. Far from a defensive move to protect European NATO states from a Russian nuclear attack, as military strategists have pointed out, the US missiles in Poland pose a total existential threat to the future existence of the Russian nation. The Russian Government has repeatedly warned of this since US plans were first unveiled in early 2007. Now, despite repeated diplomatic attempts by Russia to come to an agreement with Washington, the Bush Administration, in the wake of a humiliating US defeat in Georgia, has pressured the Government of Poland to finally sign the pact. The consequences could be unthinkable for Europe and the planet.

    ... Any illusions that a Democratic Obama Presidency would mean a rollback of such provocative NATO and US military moves of recent years should be dismissed as dangerous wishful thinking. Obama’s foreign policy team in addition to father Zbigniew Brzezinski, includes Brzezinski’s son, Ian Brzezinski, current US Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for European and NATO Affairs. Ian Brzezinski is a devout backer of US missile defense policy, as well as Kosovo independence and NATO expansion into Ukraine and Georgia. -- in Global Research.
  4. The Great Consumer Crash of 2009, by James Quinn

    August 19, 2008. After examining these charts it is clear to me that the tremendous prosperity that began during the Reagan years of the early 1980’s has been a false prosperity built upon easy credit. Household debt reached $13.8 trillion in 2007, with $10.5 trillion of that mortgage debt. The leading edge of the baby boomers turned 30 years of age in the late 1970’s, just as the usage of debt began to accelerate. Debt took off like a rocket ship after 9/11 with the President urging Americans to spend and Alan Greenspan lowering interest rates to 1%. Only in the bizzaro world of America in the last 7 years, while in the midst of 2 foreign wars, would a President urge his citizens to show their patriotism by buying cars and TVs. When did our priorities become so warped?

    (...) We have outsourced our savings to the emerging economies, along with our manufacturing jobs. The Chinese are saving the money we’ve paid them for flat screen TVs and the Middle Eastern countries are saving the money we’ve paid them for oil. You need savings in order to increase investment. The emerging markets are making the vast majority of the investments in the world. While the U.S. endlessly debates drilling and construction of nuclear plants (none built in U.S. since 1987) and oil refineries (none built in U.S. since 1977), China brought four oil refineries online in 2008 and plans to build 30 nuclear reactors in the next twelve years. The Asian Century has begun, but the U.S. has tried to keep up by using debt. It will not work. If anything, this has accelerated the shift of power to Asia.

    (...) The pseudo-wealth that has been created in the last seven years has begun to unwind, but will increase in speed in 2009. You only know how you’ve lived your life over the last seven years. Your neighbor who has been getting their house upgraded, sending their kids to private school, driving a BMW, and taking exotic vacations may have been living the high life on debt. As usual, Warren Buffet’s wisdom comes in handy.

    Only when the tide goes out do you discover who’s been swimming naked.

    The tide is on its way out, and the naked swimmers are numbered in the millions. Mohamed El-Erian, the number two man at PIMCO, fears a negative feedback loop consuming the country. I believe we have begun the negative feedback loop and it is starting to accelerate.

    (...) Consumers have dramatically increased the use of credit cards, now that the housing ATM has run out of cash. The average American household has credit card debt of $9,840 versus $2,966 in 1990, at an average interest rate of 19%. Credit card delinquencies have increased to 4.51% in the 1st quarter. Amex just announced a major unexpected write-off because its prime customers have hit the wall and are defaulting. Consumers used their credit and debit cards to buy $51 billion of fast food in 2006 according to Carddata. According to the Federal Reserve, 40% of American families spend more than they earn.

    (...) Government unemployment figures have begun to skyrocket, while the true unadjusted unemployment figures point to a major recession. If the number of people who have given up looking for a job were included, the official 5.7% unemployment rate would jump to 14%. People without jobs can’t spend money or make mortgage payments. With the deep recession that I anticipate, the official figures will reach 7%. This will result in lower consumption. -- Prudent Bear.
  5. Sobre este tema recomendo o extraordinário seminário de Chris Martenson, e ainda o esclarecedor vídeo sobre a perturbação que o crescimento fulgurante e a voracidade energética da China vieram colocar à supremacia egoísta da imperial América. O vídeo foi realizado numa perspectiva ocidental, mas ainda assim, diz tudo!

  6. China vs the US - The Battle For Oil

    China's sky-rocketing growth and shortage of sufficient resources is forcing China to set its sights outside its borders in a frantic search for oil, but the major oil-producing countries are kept off-limits by the United States, forcing China to do business with the rogue states, African dictatorships, Iran and former Russian states - to get the oil they desperately need. Featuring field encounters, archival footage, news reports and maps to outline the latest threat in world geopolitics. -- in Critical Docs.
  7. O crescimento e a progressiva autonomia tecnológica da China, bem como a sua actual riqueza em ouro (comprado a quem dele se desfez, nomeadamente para pagar dívidas de Estado), divisas e créditos internacionais, são assustadores do ponto de vista da Europa-América -- claro! Há porém um ponto frágil na actual trajectória ascendente do Império do Meio: a China depende cada vez mais criticamente, tal como dependeram e dependem a Europa e os EUA, do acesso livre ao petróleo e outras matérias primas que não já não dispõe em quantidade suficientes. Como a principal matéria energética do mundo moderno -- o petróleo -- não chega para as encomendas, as grandes potências assemelham-se cada vez mais a uma manada de elefantes dentro de uma loja de antiguidades! Eis dois exemplos chegados ontem e hoje à minha caixa de correio sobre o tipo de acções chinesas que preocupam cada vez mais a Europa e os Estados Unidos:
    China desenvolve o combóio mais rápido do mundo, entre Pequim e Xangai

    PEQUIM (AFP) - A China pretende desenvolver, com tecnologia própria, o trem mais rápido do mundo, com velocidade máxima de 380 km/h, na linha que será criada entre Pequim e Xangai, noticiou o jornal China Daily. -- in China Daily (versão original).

    Iraq approves $3b oil deal with China

    BAGHDAD - Iraq on Tuesday cleared a plan to develop an oil field by China National Petroleum Corp. (CNPC) at a service fee of US$6 a barrel.

    Iraqi Oil Minister Hussein al-Shahristani said the cabinet had approved the three-billion-dollar deal that will see China's State-owned company developing the Al-Ahdab oil field in the central Shiite province of Wasit. -- in China Daily.

OAM 426 03-09-2008 20:21 (última actualização 15:44)